The Germans are trailing way behind the rest of Europe
Daniela Hinrichs on 19.04.2006 at 20:35 h
Some sobering news did the rounds recently: Germany is still firmly in the developing world when it comes to blogging. No, this is not a late April Fool’s joke, even if the current UPS Europe Business Monitor was published at the beginning of April. And the figures aren’t getting any brighter, no matter which colours we use for our bar charts and pie graphs.
The Germans are trailing way behind the rest of Europe in the illustrious blog league. Take a little closer look at the results and you could be forgiven for thinking that the blog god lives and works in France. Whilst 57% of all managers interviewed in Germany did not know what blogs were, this figure was just 16% in France. What a difference! But what could be the reasons for this?
Here are some completely subjective thoughts from me:
- Managers who get their secretaries to print out their emails because they can’t or don’t want to work their email programs, are bound to be left behind in the blogging evolution of mankind.
- The majority of decision-makers in the so-called top 15,000 companies in Europe are over 50-years-old and simply use other means, e.g. internal sources, to make decisions and gain access to information.
- Even if managers have heard of blogs they often lack the courage to post their thoughts in writing – across the world. Someone might read it after all. Not to be forgotten: “business blogging” only forms a small part of the entire study and 29% of all those interviewed had heard of weblogs. Better than nothing I suppose.
But the question remains: what are we going to do with the 1% of managers that read blogs and blog themselves?

Welcome, lovely stereotypes. :) The report doesn't really say much about managers who get their email printed out, does it? I'm not saying that there aren't some around doing so. But "the average manager"? Please. And when it comes to blogging: There isn't really much intrinsic value in blogging, is there? I know it is pretty opportune these days to claim that one has to live in his or her feed collection. I'm not too sure about it. It may be the best thing to do for some. But it may also just be OK if quite some others just care about getting their work done. Even if their work doesn't have anything to do with blogs, pod-, or vidcasts.
As for those "primary source for information on business issues": Printed newspapers aren't that bad, after all. Yes, they do pre-filter the information they provide. Yes, that may just be a good thing. And no, one doesn't have to agree with every such filter being around. And I am still keeping my eyes open for smart and promising ideas of pre-filtering available information sources in our fancy blogospheric world.
One thing I definitely agree with: The kind of implicit statement that we are talking about a social challenge here, not a technological one.